Wedding Planning Community - Wedding News Forums & Blogs
Wedding Photographers and Videographers Being Sued By The Music Industry For Use of Copyright Music On Wedding Videos & Slideshows On Their Websites and Shared On YouTube - Full Story On TyingTheKnott.com Wedding News.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Article By: Phillip Brunelle
U.S. NATIONAL NEWS (www.TyingTheKnott.com) -- If you're a wedding photographer or videographer you are hereby being warned, the music industry is listening closely to videos and slideshows on your website and videos shared on YouTube. What are they listening for? Copyright music being used without the permission and license to do so.
It may have started with the wedding of Tony Romo, the Dallas Cowboys' quarterback, who married Candice Crawford in May. People magazine said the five-minute video they had made "hit the Internet looking more like a blockbuster movie trailer than nuptial footage" -- and soon it went viral on YouTube, complete with Coldplay's "Fix You" as theme music.
The wedding video has since been pulled off YouTube -- and so, apparently, have been many wedding videos belonging to less-famous couples. The videographer who shot the Romo-Crawford wedding video was threatened with a lawsuit for using music to which he had not bought the rights. The videographer has settled, and agreed not to talk about it, and a chill has settled across the nice, warm world of weddings.
"Please don't use my name," said one wedding photographer who spoke to us. "We're just small fish. I don't want to be in the spotlight. They might just aim at me."
This wedding photographer said he has now removed all the videos he previously posted on YouTube, Vimeo, or his own website with well-known music in the background. He said he can buy generic music for $50 for a three-minute track, but it cuts into his profits and his newlywed clients don't like it as much. "We're just scared," he said. "We don't know what is going to happen to us."
THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IS SENDING A MESSAGE
"I don't think there's a mass attack in general, but a strong message was sent," said Ron Dawson, a video producer in Atlanta who has shot many weddings. "There have been wedding videos online with music for years, and it came to a head because videos have been increasing in style and quality. This year a couple got a million views online."
A high-end wedding video can cost several thousand dollars. But Dawson said wedding videographers are generally small businesspeople, so the threat of a lawsuit is a big deal to them.
"Getting that letter in my inbox and as a fax was super scary," said the videographer who was threatened with the lawsuit. He was quoted -- carefully declining to say what video or music was involved -- in a conversation Dawson posted online at Dare Dreamer, a magazine for video producers. "I did have a video that went viral, we had used a very popular song on it, someone saw it and brought it to the attention of the label's legal team and from there they came after us."
TIMES HAVE CERTAINLY CHANGED
The wedding videographers' dilemma is a reflection of life in the digital age. Twenty years ago, a photographer might have shot video of a reception, given the happy couple half a dozen copies of the edited version, and that would have been that.
But weddings have been changed by the Internet. A photographer now puts together a video -- or an elaborately-produced online slide show with background music -- and emails the link, for a fee, to the newlyweds' guests. This at a time when the music industry is under continual siege, undercut by people's ability to copy music digitally without paying for it.
What does all this mean for you, if you're getting married and want the day on video? Mainly, photographers say not to be surprised if you can't have your favorite music as the background track. If you picked a top-40 hit for your first dance, the photographer may be afraid to post it online. Your photographer is unlikely to be sued -- but may worry about it if your wedding video becomes a hit on YouTube or another video sharing website.
Jim Steinblatt, a spokesman for ASCAP, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, said, "It would be rare that anyone would go after someone on a wedding video. Basically they're for family and friends."
But Dalita Keumurian, the director of marketing for The Harry Fox Agency, which collects license fees for music publishers, said, "If someone is using music, they should be getting permission."
The photographer we quoted at the beginning of this article said he and others he knows worry they're easy targets. Even if there have only been a couple of high-profile legal cases, he said he can't risk one. "We can't live without showing our work online," he said, "but because of the lawsuits we have to pull it off the web."
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Share your opinion in the comment section below. Members of Tying The Knott can comment in the members comment section below, and if you're not yet a member you can Join Here- It's free and quick to signup - or you can comment using the Facebook comment section just below here...
You Can Also Comment Using Our Facebook Comment Section Here:
OTHER ARTICLES TRENDING IN TODAY'S WEDDING NEWS:
Subscribe To TyingTheKnott Wedding News RSS Feed - Subscribe Here
Views: 1678
Tags: Copyright, Copyright Music, Lawsuit, Music, Music Industry, News, Phillip Brunelle, Photographer, Photographers, Photographers Sued, More…Sued, Suing, TyingTheKnott.com, Videographer, Videographers, Videographers Sued, Wedding, Wedding News, Weddings
Comment by Bianca Moran on December 15, 2011 at 12:19am I know that the music industry is trying to send out a message, but they are choosing to use small business owners such as wedding photographers and videographers as an example, and it doesn't seem fair. They are profiting off their work, not off the work of the artists in the songs. The music is just to enhance and add drama to the videos and photos. If someone has a wedding video on YouTube of their wedding reception with music being played by a disc jockey in the background of the video, does that mean that those videos are in copyright violation too?
Comment by Gerald Sousa on December 15, 2011 at 12:24am Back before the days of the music industry fighting anyone from using music without a license nobody (including the artists) cared whether or not a wedding photographer used music in a photo slideshow, or if a videographer put music in their video. But now thanks to YouTube and people sharing their wedding videos that become viral, the music industry doesn't want YouTube and the people posting the videos to earn money from advertisements on the videos when they didn't get paid to use the music, and I can somewhat understand that, but if a wedding photographer or videographer uses the music on their website to show their work that should not be a copyright violation... I'm on the fence about this, and as a wedding photographer myself, I will just have to use royalty free music in slideshows since I could never afford to buy a license for to use music.
Comment

© 2013 Created by Phillip Brunelle.
You need to be a member of TyingTheKnott.com Wedding Network to add comments!
Join TyingTheKnott.com Wedding Network